文档目录 · Contents
ZenStory AI ZenStory Workbench 工作台文档
素材深度分析
带着一个写作问题阅读参考文本,再把学到的方法用于自己的场景。分析条目帮助定位,具体原文用来验证判断。
选择一个问题
例如:“人物怎样改变目标,而不是突然讲一段道理?”先找到相关章节或短片段,别一次要求归纳整本书的全部优点。
把笔记分为三类:原文明示、有依据的解读、需要补读的问题。人物标签和章节摘要不能替代具体行动。
示例:什么改变了选择
下面是原创教学片段:
方遥把旧演出录音剪到第三遍,母亲的独奏仍被椅响盖住。听音会节目单写着“她最好的演奏”。朋友建议删掉杂音,接上后面重复的小节。
方遥来回播放。后面一遍快了一点。椅响之后,母亲轻声说:“别急,等他坐稳。”
方遥撤掉拼接,划掉节目单那行字,改成“那天,她停了一下”。
可以这样分析:
| 层次 | 本段依据 |
|---|---|
| 原文事实 | 反复剪辑、听见一句话、撤销拼接、修改节目单 |
| 解读 | 她从呈现最佳演奏,转向保留一次有意义的停顿 |
| 尚未证明 | 听众的反应、母亲的生平,以及方遥是否从此改变 |
她改变了成功标准,但杂音和被盖住的独奏还在,代价没有消失。
请 AI 核对你的解读
附加相关条目或引用原文,再提出问题:
只分析这段原文,列出人物起初的目标、改变目标的依据、实际选择和剩余代价。
每个解读附短引文。资料不足的地方写明缺哪段上下文。
不补人物生平,不续写故事,不修改项目文件。
读完回复后回到原句。没有证据的判断留作问题,不直接收入自己的设定。
把方法变成新场景
借鉴“重新选择成功标准,同时保留代价”,可以设计完全不同的行动:
岑一只剩十分钟小车练习时间。他可以完成自己的全速练习,也可以询问第一次玩的陶陶是否想试一次左转。若他选择把时段留给陶陶,就让她自己同意、自己操作;自己的整圈练习仍未完成。
先选人物目标、选择和代价,再要求起草。不要只把录音换成录像、人名换掉,却沿用同一组事件。
写岑一把剩余练习时段交给陶陶的场景。
用询问、交出控制器和等待表现变化,不写总结道理。
结尾陶陶自己完成一次左转,岑一的全速练习仍未完成。
先在对话中给候选正文,不写入文件。
保存自己的阅读成果
参考笔记记录原文位置、短引文和解读;作品提纲只放你已采用的新设计。候选正文采用后,再保存到正文文件并更新进度。
Material analysis
Read with a specific writing question, then apply the method to your own scene. Analysis items help locate evidence; source passages verify your interpretation.
Choose one question
For example: “How does a character change their goal without delivering a lesson?” Find a relevant chapter or passage rather than asking for every strength of a whole book.
Separate explicit facts, supported interpretation, and questions needing more reading. Character labels and summaries cannot replace specific actions.
Example: what changes a choice
This is an original teaching passage:
Fang Yao edited the old concert recording for the third time. A chair scrape still covered her mother's solo. The listening-event program read “Her finest performance.” A friend suggested removing the noise and splicing in a later repetition.
Fang played both sections. The later one was faster. After the scrape, her mother said softly, “No hurry. Let him get settled.”
Fang undid the splice and changed the program line to “That day, she paused.”
Read it in layers:
| Layer | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Explicit facts | Repeated editing, hearing a line, undoing the splice, changing the program |
| Interpretation | Her goal shifts from the finest performance to preserving a meaningful pause |
| Not established | Audience response, her mother's biography, or a permanent change in Fang |
Her success criterion changes, but the noise and obscured solo remain. The cost has not vanished.
Ask the AI to check your interpretation
Attach an item or quote the source, then ask:
Analyze this passage only: initial goal, evidence for changing it,
actual choice, and remaining cost. Support interpretations with short quotes.
Identify missing context. Do not invent biographies, continue the story, or edit files.
Return to the source afterward. Keep unsupported judgments as questions rather than established settings.
Turn the method into a new scene
To borrow “changing the success criterion while retaining a cost,” design a different action:
Cen Yi has ten minutes left to practice with his toy car. He can complete a full-speed run or ask first-time visitor Tao Tao whether she wants to try turning left. If he gives her the time, let her agree and operate herself; his own full lap remains unfinished.
Choose the goal, action, and cost before drafting. Changing names or replacing a recording with video is not enough if the same events remain.
Draft Cen giving the remaining practice slot to Tao.
Show the change through a question, handing over the controller, and waiting.
Do not add a lesson speech. End with Tao completing one left turn herself
while Cen's full-speed run remains unfinished. Give candidate prose in chat only.
Save your reading
Reference notes retain the source location, short quotes, and interpretations. Your outline holds only new designs you accept. Save adopted prose in a draft file, then update progress.
See Materials for uploads and attachments, then continue with writing workflow.