文档目录 · Contents
ZenStory AI ZenStory Workbench 工作台文档
写作工作流
每轮结束时，保存采用的文字与决定，并记下下一轮从哪里继续。你可以按场景、整章或完整短篇推进，明确本轮目标和依据即可。
先决定这轮要交付什么
| 阶段 | 请求 | 结束时留下 |
|---|---|---|
| 探索 | 比较少量故事方向 | 已选方案与待定问题 |
| 规划 | 整理人物目标、阻力与场景变化 | 保存的提纲和必要设定 |
| 起草 | 写指定场景或章节 | 可阅读的正文与停止位置 |
| 修订 | 对照依据修改具体问题 | 采用的改动及相关设定更新 |
人物动机尚未决定时，先解决动机；已经明确整章方向时，也不必强行拆为固定字数的小段。
用文件保留决定
人物、设定、大纲和正文各有位置。参考笔记与正式设定分开，待定方案标明待定。AI 记忆只留简短背景和实际进度。
发送前保存重要修改，打开目标文件，点名本轮需要读取的资料；局部问题用引用定位。不要靠一长串旧聊天保存唯一的创作决定。
从第1场继续第2场
《关窗之前》第1场已经写到描述不符。下一场可以继续追问物件，也可以转向认领依据。先选本场解决哪个问题，再要求正文：
先读当前人物文件、三场景提纲和第1场。
第2场只推进认领依据，不揭露报错原因。
沈敏先说出包底补丁特征，林禾再核对，最后她说“包不是我的”。
用林禾有限视角，包仍留在窗口。写入《第2场 核对》，不继续第3场。
补丁和对白是本例新增的写作决定，需要先确认并加入提纲。描述对得上，不等于认领资格已获证实。
修改时先看事实，再看表达
如果一句话从“怀疑”变成“已知”，先修正信息边界，再调整节奏。只改问题段落，保留已经采用的行动和结果。
剧情方向确实改变时，再检查受影响的人物、提纲与正文；语言润色不应顺便重选结局。
结束时记录进度
已完成：第2场已保存，补丁已核对，包未交付。
待决定：沈敏与失主的关系、报错原因、最终归属。
下一轮：先讨论第3场的选择，不写正文。
依据：人物文件、当前三场景提纲和前两场。
只有实际入稿并保存后才写“完成”。中断时记录停止处，先读现稿再补缺口。重要节点可以检查历史，完成后导出一份正文副本。
Writing workflow
At the end of each turn, save the text and decisions you accept, and record where to continue. Work by scene, chapter, or complete short story, with a clear goal and supporting notes.
Choose this turn's deliverable
| Stage | Request | Result to retain |
|---|---|---|
| Explore | Compare a few directions | A chosen option and open questions |
| Plan | Organize goals, obstacles, and scene changes | Saved outline and necessary settings |
| Draft | Write a named scene or chapter | Readable prose and a stopping point |
| Revise | Repair a specific problem against evidence | Adopted changes and relevant setting updates |
Settle a missing motive first. If a whole chapter is already clear, you do not need to split it into arbitrary word-count fragments.
Keep decisions in files
Characters, lore, outlines, and prose have separate places. Keep reference notes apart from established settings and label undecided options. AI Memory holds short background and actual progress.
Save important changes, open the target, and name this turn's evidence files. Quote local problems. Avoid keeping your only creative decision in a long old conversation.
Continue from Scene 1 to Scene 2
Scene 1 of Before Closing ends with the mismatched description. The next scene can investigate the object or the basis of the claim. Choose its question before drafting:
Read the current characters, Three-scene outline, and Scene 1.
Scene 2 advances the basis of the claim, not the reason for the mistake.
Shen describes the bag's patch before Lin checks it, then says “The bag isn't mine.”
Use Lin's limited viewpoint. Keep the bag at the desk.
Write into Scene 2 — The check; do not continue to Scene 3.
The patch and dialogue are new decisions in this example; confirm them and add them to the outline first. A matching description does not prove entitlement to the bag.
Check facts before expression
If suspicion becomes certainty in a sentence, fix the knowledge boundary before adjusting rhythm. Edit the problem passage while preserving approved actions and outcomes.
When the plot changes, review affected characters, outline, and prose separately. A language polish should not quietly choose a different ending.
Record progress at the end
Complete: Scene 2 saved. The patch was checked; the bag remains at the desk.
Open: Shen's relationship to the owner, reason for the mistake, final recipient.
Next: Discuss Scene 3's choice before drafting.
Evidence: Characters, current Three-scene outline, and the first two scenes.
Mark work complete only after it is saved. After interruption, record the stopping point, read the current draft, and fill the gap. Check history at important milestones and export a prose copy when finished.
Related: first short story, editor, and version history.